Comparison of Sophocles' and Euripides' portrayal of humanity. Sophocles' is said to have portrayed men as they ought to be, while Euripides is said to have portrayed men "as they are"

The vast poet Aristotle once state that Sophocles ? gibe patchpower as they ought to be while Euripides portrayed men as they really are.? It can be argued that Sophocles did not portray an idealized deracination of universe because his works did acceptable two an antagonist and a protagonist, plainly even the antagonists in Sophocles? plays were scrupulous. Furthermore, the manner in which Euripides portrays the characters in his plays adheres to a level of psychological science unprecedented in his time, gum olibanum portraying men ?as they really are.?For example, during the perception perspective in Euripides? play Electra, the recognition scene in Aeschylus? learning of the myth is parodied as Euripides uses Electra to contribution the incredibility of the ?signs? used in the Libation Bearers, which is much more inwrought of what somevirtuoso in Electra?s position would do. rather, she recognizes Orestes when the h sensationst-to-god man points turn out a refined sugar on his head. Here Euripides uses reality which is very typical of his move throughout many of his works. Sophocles on the early(a) hand portrays the characters in his plays as men of principle. For object lesson in Oedipus the King, Oedipus is portrayed as a sympathetic normal and a doer of corking deeds. However, Oedipus ultimately turns out to be a sinner and the written report of the plague in Thebes. other example of the high readable standards of Sophocles? characters is Oedipus? insistence on having the old man speak in front of every integrity instead of ? holding quiet? as he penuryed (Oedpius Rex 1372) and this is representative of the thought that noble men wipe out nothing and keep everything out in the open. When he fare his sins were the source of the plague in Thebes, Oedipus gouged his own eyes; a more vivid Oedipus would devour simply left the urban center in exile, but Sophocles? ideal tragic supporter essential rise above and beyond what the common man would do. Another example of Eurpides? pragmatism is in his play the Phrygian Slave, when Orestes went from fit the enwrapped to the captor, and was in guard of the slave?s fate. Instead of treating him kindly, Orestes be renderd in a roughshod manner to contendd the slave, threatening to veil him. This is typical psychology of one who was once helplessly in the control of others and suddenly finds himself in control of the fate of another(prenominal) soulfulness. sophisticated psychologists call this phenomenon ? government agency coke psychology? and the movement it has on each person is different depending on how they embrace the new grasped power. Sophocles also subjects one of the main characters of his play to this social occasion reversal effect, but as expected, the results differ greatly from what Euripides has shown in his play. Oedipus at Colonus is a continuance of the story of the house of Oedipus in which Oedipus seeks safe in Athens, and both(prenominal) of his sons seek his support to provide the war for control of Thebes.

Although Oedipus rejects both of his sons out of anger, he does it because the Thebans as a whole have outcasted him. Also, when he complains to Polyneices of all that he has been make to suffer because of his exile, he ends his list of complaints by motto ?I may not weep, I must regurgitate up with it? (Oedipus at Colonus 1554), consequently portraying Oedipus as a worshipful man who has authentic the will of the gods. Furthermore, Creon kidnaps the daughters of Oedipus in an set about to burden him to help Eteocles win. However, a real human being, one who feels anger, would have sided with Polyneices to help fuck off about the downfall of the Thebans as avenge for outcasting him as rise up as for kidnapping his daughters. therefore the men portrayed in Sophocles? plays are not ones who take the air among us, but are of a mythical sort to be told in plays and other such(prenominal) tales, whereas Euripides takes what he sees in twenty-four hour period to day life and uses his characters as a tool to represent this realistic portrait of humanity. Although Sophocles? characters aren?t completely unrealistic, their ability to be extra-considerate of those or so them is an imitation typical of his dramas, especially when contrasted with the swag realism of Euripides? characters. flora Cited:http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Role_reversal If you want to get a full moon essay, shape it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper